Patient preference for deferasirox film-coated versus dispersible tablet formulation: a sequential-design phase 2 study in patients with thalassemia.

Iron chelation therapy (ICT) is the mainstay of treatment in patients with thalassemia requiring blood transfusions. This phase 2 JUPITER study evaluated patient preference between film-coated tablet (FCT) and dispersible tablet (DT) in transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) or non-TDT (NTDT) patients treated with both formulations in a sequential manner. The primary endpoint was patient-reported preference for FCT over DT, while secondary outcomes included patient reported outcomes (PROs) evaluated by overall preference, and by age, thalassemia transfusion status, and previous ICT status. Out of 183 patients screened, 140 and 136 patients completed the treatment periods 1 and 2 of the core study, respectively. At week 48, the majority of patients preferred FCT over DT (90.3 vs. 7.5%; difference of percentage: 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.89; P < 0.0001]). FCT scored better on secondary PROs and showed less severe gastrointestinal symptoms than DT, except in the change of modified Satisfaction with Iron Chelation Therapy (mSICT) preference scores, which were similar for both the formulations. Patients with TDT had stable ferritin levels, while it showed a downward trend up to week 48 in patients with NTDT on deferasirox treatment. Overall, 89.9% of patients reported ≥ 1 adverse event (AE), of which 20.3% experienced ≥ 1 serious AE. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were proteinuria, pyrexia, urine protein/creatinine ratio increase, diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infections, transaminase increase, and pharyngitis. Overall, this study reinforced the observations from the previous study by showing a distinct patient preference for FCT over DT formulation and further supported the potential benefits of life-long compliance with ICT.

Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with spondyloarthritis and enthesitis at the Achilles tendon: results from a phase 3b trial.

OBJECTIVE: ACHILLES aimed to demonstrate efficacy of secukinumab on Achilles' tendon enthesitis in spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years (n = 204) with active PsA or axial SpA and heel enthesitis were randomized 1:1 to secukinumab 150/300 mg or placebo up to week 24, and thereafter placebo patients were switched to secukinumab. RESULTS: At week 24, a higher, yet statistically non-significant (P = 0.136), proportion of patients in secukinumab vs placebo reported resolution of Achilles tendon enthesitis in affected foot (42.2% vs 31.4%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.63; 95% CI: 0.87, 3.08). Proportion of patients reporting resolution of enthesitis based on Leeds Enthesitis Index was higher with secukinumab vs placebo (33.3% vs 23.5%; OR = 1.65; 95% CI: 0.85, 3.25) at week 24. Mean change from baseline in heel pain at week 24 was higher in secukinumab patients vs placebo (-2.8 [3.0] vs -1.9 [2.7]). Greater improvements with secukinumab were observed in heel enthesopathy activity and global assessment of disease activity. Imaging evaluation by local reading confirmed heel enthesitis on MRI at screening for all patients. Based on central reading, 56% presented with bone marrow oedema and/or tendinitis; according to Heel Enthesitis MRI Scoring System (HEMRIS) post hoc analysis, 76% had signs of entheseal inflammation while 86% had entheseal inflammation and/or structural changes. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients showed no signs of inflammation on the centrally read MRIs despite a clinical diagnosis of heel enthesitis, thus highlighting that the discrepancy between the clinical and imaging assessments of enthesitis requires further investigation. Although ACHILLES did not meet the primary end point, the study reported clinically meaningful improvements in patient-related outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02771210.

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Switching from Oral Cholinesterase Inhibitors to Rivastigmine Transdermal Patch with 1-Step Titration in Patients with Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A 24-Week, Open-Label, Multicenter Study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated treatment options for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) showing a poor response to oral cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) in Japan. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of switching from oral ChEIs to rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with AD. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, phase IV study in outpatient clinics in Japan, patients with mild-moderate AD who had a poor response to or experienced difficulty in continuing donepezil or galantamine were switched to rivastigmine transdermal patch (5 cm2; loaded dose 9 mg, delivery rate 4.6 mg/24 h) with a 1-step titration in week 4 (10 cm2; loaded dose 18 mg, delivery rate 9.5 mg/24 h), which was continued for 4 weeks in the titration period and 16 weeks in a maintenance period. The primary endpoint was the change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) total score from baseline to week 24. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were enrolled and switched to rivastigmine, of which 102 completed the 24-week study. The MMSE total score was essentially unchanged during the study, with a least-square mean change (SD) of -0.35 (2.64) at week 24 (p = 0.1750). Exploratory analysis with a mixed-effect model comparing changes in MMSE between the pre- and post-switch periods suggested that switching to rivastigmine prevented a worsening of MMSE. Application site skin reactions/irritations occurred in 30.5% of patients overall, in 22.0% in the 8-week titration period, and in 10.2% in the 16-week maintenance period. CONCLUSION: Within-class switching from an oral ChEI to rivastigmine transdermal patch might be an efficacious and tolerable option for AD patients showing a poor or limited response to a prior oral ChEI.